Live Conference  
  18:00 to 21:00 GMT  
 

The Use of Co-Trustees


Some clients prefer more than one trustee to be appointed to manage their trust and will insist that co-trustees are appointed.

As we saw when considering the duties of trustees, if more than one is appointed they must act unanimously and unless the trust deed specifies, a majority decision will not bind the minority.

Usually, a co-trustee is appointed in those cases where a trust corporation is not involved. They are therefore most commonly found in those where the client has appointed trusted advisers to act (such as partners in a particular legal or accountancy practice). Often a member of the settlor's family is appointed alongside a 'professional' trustee (which in this context has been taken to mean someone who provides trustee services as part of their livelihood and who is paid for their services).

More than one trustee can help in the decision making process, usually by assisting discussions concerning the merits of a particular distribution or the exercise of an administrative power. This is usually the case where a family member, who is aware of the settlor's intentions and wishes, is appointed alongside a professional trustee.

However, they can also create potential problems. For example, if one of the trustees is resident offshore and the other is located onshore, the tax authorities in the onshore centre might decide the trust is taxable in that jurisdiction on the basis that part of the management and control is exercised from that location.

In addition to possible taxation problems, the settlor should also be aware of potential administration problems which can stem from the duty of the trustees to act together. Depending on the number and location of the co-trustees, it could be a difficult task to obtain the consent of them all before a particular action is taken. As a result, distributions could be delayed, as could the simple appointment of an agent, such as an investment adviser or banker.

The Appeal of Trust Corporations
Before moving on to the role and rights of the settlor, we should consider the use and appeal of trust corporations in offshore centres, as although it is possible for individuals to be appointed, it is much more common for a corporate entity to be used for offshore trusts.

Licencing requirements
In some centres a trustee has to be licensed and there would usually be a capital adequacy requirement which often only a corporate trustee could meet.

Continuity
Unlike individuals, a corporation can continue in perpetuity and so the death or transfer of an employee will not affect the continuance of the trusteeship, nor would one hope the quality of the service.

In addition, a trust corporation will seldom change location. It may move offices within the offshore centre but it would rarely decide to relocate to another jurisdiction. There will therefore be continuity in terms of residence in the offshore centre chosen for their trust.

Multi-jurisdictional
Many trust corporations have operations in more than one centre. This can provide a greater base of experience and knowledge of the offshore industry and also provides an opportunity for the trust to migrate to another office of the organisation in the event of a trigger event under a flee clause provision. A flee clause is one under which the law of the trust or residence of the trustees will change on the happening of a predetermined event, such as civil unrest, in the offshore centre originally chosen.

Expertise
Trust companies pride themselves on possession a high degree of expertise as well as the necessary resources to service trust business effectively and efficiently.

Many trust corporations also possess investment departments which can be used to provide investment management services. In some cases they will also be affiliated to a bank or a company management function which can mean that the entire management and administration of an offshore structure can be conducted under the same roof. This is a factor which can create certain efficiencies and cost savings.

Internal audit
Trust companies will usually be subject to external audit requirements and in addition, they will also have in place internal controls and checks to ensure that the service is being delivered efficiently as well as effectively. Many of the larger institutions will have internal audit departments which help police the various offices and can play a very useful trouble shooting role.

Security
Many settlors favour trust corporations because of the security aspect. If there was a dispute and the trustees were found to be at fault, it would probably by easier for the beneficiaries to obtain financial recourse from a negligent trust corporation than from an individual who was acting as trustee.

The Rights and Role of the Settlor
Many trustees believe that the settlor of a trust will retain certain rights over the trust property. However, unless the trust deed specifically provides them with certain powers, the settlor of a trust will have no rights whatsoever over the administration of the trust or the trust property.

The Rights of the Beneficiaries
It is sometimes possible for trustees to forget that the beneficiaries of a trust have certain rights. Although most of these rights should be a matter of applying common sense on the part of the trustees, it is often the most obvious issues which are most commonly missed.

The "common sense" rights are as follows:

  • A beneficiary has the right to be treated fairly be the trustees;

  • A beneficiary has the right to receive distributions from the correct part of the fund (e .g. an income beneficiary should receive only income payments)

A further right, which is not often employed, is:

  • Where all the beneficiaries are sui juris ( in other words, they are all over the age of majority and all have full capacity) and are between them absolutely entitled to the trust property, they have the right to request that the trustees terminate the trust and pay the trust funds to them.

However, the area which can cause the greatest administrative problems and give risk to the most debate is the right of the beneficiaries to receive information relating to the trust and their interests.

Disclosure of information to the Trust Beneficiaries
It is generally accepted that trust beneficiaries have a right to request and receive information relating to their interest under the trust. For example, the life tenant of a fixed trust is entitled to be told that the extent of his interest, of his interest, how much income is being generated on the trust fund and also the capital value of that fund. Similarly, the remaindermen has a right to know what is the capital value is as one day he will receive a capital benefit. Consequently, in fixed trusts, beneficiaries usually receive copies of the trust accounts.

However, the position concerning discretionary beneficiaries is not as clear cut because they only receive a benefit at the discretion of the trustees. Once a payment has been made to them they cease to have an interest, unless the trustees decide to exercise their discretion in their favour again in the future.

For example, the beneficiary might require to accounts as part of an investigation by an onshore revenue authority or the details might be requested to enable the beneficiary to initiate proceedings against the trustee or settlor. In such situations, the trustees should refuse.

Another consideration is whether there are any statutory restrictions in place which restrict the release of information, such as there is in respect of exempted trusts in the Cayman Islands where it can be an offence to release information to the beneficiaries

Apart from accounting details, the discretionary beneficiaries might also request copies of all paperwork which records how the trustees have exercised their discretion. For example, they might want to know why the trustee has acted in a particular manner

Similarly, the contents of a letter of wishes might be requested. However, documents such as the letter of wishes and minutes of trustee's meetings may have to be released under the rights to discovery in hostile litigation.

The possibility that the contents of a letter of wishes might become public knowledge has led to some advisers suggesting that their clients request the trustees to record their wishes in a file note which the trustees then sign. This is often referred to as a memorandum o wishes and such a document can, in some cases, fall outside a discovery order.

Objects of a power
Whist on the subject of beneficiaries, it is worth mentioning that the persons who can benefit only as a result of the trustees exercising power on their favour, such as the power to appoint capital if the trustees so decide, will have less rights to information that those discretionary beneficiaries who can benefit subject to the trustees exercising a discretion in their favour.

Often you will find that an offshore discretionary trust will only convey benefits to persons under a power which makes those persons the objects of a power rather than the objects of the trust. This is done primarily to reduce the rights to information which those persons would otherwise enjoy if they were discretionary beneficiaries.


The rights to Control the Trustees
Finally, unless the trust deed state otherwise, the beneficiaries have no right to influence the trustees in the performance of their duties or powers. Similarly, unless the deed states otherwise, the beneficiaries will not have the right to remove or appoint trustees.

In most instances they do however, have the right to enforce the terms of the trust against the trustees.

 
     

 

 
 

E-mail webmaster@offshore4U.co.uk with questions, comments about this web site.
Copyright © 2004 Offshore4U
Last modified: 04/10/05

 

Site By: Link192 - Design Studio